Archive for the 'ParticipateDB' Category

ParticipateDB: References

Just a quick weekend update to share the latest ParticipateDB developments:

Today, we launched the site’s third main content bucket: referencesHere’s how we define the term in the FAQ:

How do you define “references”?

A reference to us is any kind of related information on the web that can provide more context and detail to any of the tools and projects covered on ParticipateDB. For example, this may include but is not limited to: product brochures, white papers, video tutorials, any kind of research, case studies, or interviews.

Because it is a good read and because it is full with mentions of various e-participation tools and projects, we picked a paper titled “Promising Practices In Online Engagement” by Public Agenda’s Center for the Advances in Public Engagement (CAPE) as our first entry to this new section. Plenty  more resources will have to be added in the future, but hopefully this illustrates how the site is intended to work.

ParticipateDB reference highlight

With the addition of references, the initial data model is pretty much complete and online. The last piece that’s missing now is proper user management before we can move the site into beta (and really start letting more people in).

In case you’re interested, feel free to follow ParticipateDB via the usual social channels: Identi.caTwitterFacebook and GovLoop

Ascentum Checklist: “Open Policy Making 101″

Over on the recently re-launched Ascentum blog, Joseph Peters (Partner at Ascentum) and Joe Goldman (Vice President of Citizen Engagement at AmericaSpeaks) just published a neat list of ten key questions to consider before launching an online public consultation: Open Policy Making 101: 10 Questions To Ask Before Launching Your Online Public Consultation

1. What do you want to know?
2. What is your commitment to participants?
3. Who needs to participate?
4. How hot is the issue?
5. What type of contribution are you looking for?
6. What type of data will you collect and analyze?
7. What are your timelines?
8. What resources are available to support the
process?
9. How can participants stay involved?
10. Which online tools should you use?
Joe Goldman is the Vice President of Citizen
Engagement at AmericaSpeaks.
Joseph Peters is a Partner at Ascentum.
Introducing Government Agencies to Web 2.0
  1. What do you want to know?
  2. What is your commitment to participants?
  3. Who needs to participate?
  4. How hot is the issue?
  5. What type of contribution are you looking for?
  6. What type of data will you collect and analyze?
  7. What are your timelines?
  8. What resources are available to support the process?
  9. How can participants stay involved?
  10. Which online tools should you use?

The document (PDF, 916 KB) lays out these principles in good details. Once again, the recommendations are concerned about good process first and tools second.

Their take on timelines is fairly specific, and I would like to hear if others in this field can either confirm or add to it:

Generally speaking, a process that is open to the general public should be live for four to six weeks to ensure adequate participation.

Finally, here’s their item number ten:

10.  Which online tools should you use?

This question is intentionally left until last in this list. Many organizations choose a shiny new tool and decide to use it before carefully considering their overall approach.  This ends up having the software drive the process and not the objectives. There are many tools and solutions to choose from, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. The options are endless, but you need to match the tool to your strategy based on the questions you have already answered from the list above.

Exactly. And supporting that mapping process of finding the right tools for the job is something we’d like to see ParticipateDB grow into over time.

ParticipateDB: Projects

A few weeks into this fun side project, we just added “projects” to ParticipateDB. As I mentioned at launch, the idea is to show where the various tools are being used in practice and how (there are only a handful of fairly unrefined entries available yet but you get the idea).

The project entries don’t aspire to be full-fledged case studies (far from it — if case studies or other related materials exist they will be linked to). Instead, entries should give the reader a quick overview of what each project was about. At a bare minimum, we’d like to capture the following project information:

  • Title
  • Description (specifically goals and outcomes)
  • Time/duration
  • Convener/organizer
  • Country

What else is missing and would be useful? Please comment below.

We will be adding “resources” next (links to related online articles and resources for both project and tools, such as white papers, product brochures, case studies etc.) and add more seed content. We hope to let in a first round of beta testers in late November.

ParticipateDB

Probably the most memorable presentation at the 2007 Community Next conference in Stanford was “The Patent-Pending skinnyCorp Method for Creating Online Awesomeness and Other Cool Stuff” by Jeffrey Kalmikoff and Jake Nickell of skinnyCorp, makers of Threadless and other entertaining projects large and small.

As Kalmikoff pointed out in one of the stories they shared (starts at around 4:50 into the video):

As things happen, the line you’re gonna hear at skinnyCorp a lot if you stop by is: “Wouldn’t it be awesome if…?”

My key take-away back then: watch out for that phrase, it might lead to fun projects! Plus, looking at the world with a wouldn’t-it-be-awesome-if mindset seems like a sure-fire way to delight your community (and your customers).

Well, the phrase has come up a lot over the past twelve months. At the conferences and events that I had a chance to attend (and even at some of the ones I followed remotely), the conversations often seemed to circle back to one recurring theme:

  • Wouldn’t it be nice if there was a site that lists all the online tools for public participation and civic engagement that are out there?
  • Wouldn’t it be great if we had a comprehensive guide to all the commercial and open source products that support online dialogues and e-consultations?
  • Wouldn’t it be awesome if we could keep track of recently launched projects in this area and even compare them side by side?

Yes, yes, and yes.

We’ve been monitoring this space internally for quite some time now, occasionally sharing our findings. Yet while we’ve managed to build a decent list for our own use, it is by no means complete. And with so many new initiatives and interesting projects popping up left and right almost every week, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to keep up.

To solve this problem, and since nobody else appeared to be going for it, we thought it might be a good idea to build a small app that lets anyone collect and share their favorite tools for participation. We call it:

ParticipateDB

A directory of online tools for participation that anyone can edit.

The site is live but is not fully functional yet. Over the next few weeks, we plan to seed it with some of our own data, add some basic site functionalities and then hope to open up to the public later this Fall.

Please contact us or leave a comment if you have feedback. You can follow ParticipateDB on Identi.ca or Twitter, and we will let you know when things are happening.

In the spirit of International Day of Democracy, which is today, we hope ParticipateDB will make the world of online participation a little more awesome.

In 2007 the United Nations General Assembly decided to observe September 15th as the International Day of Democracy and invited all member states and organizations to commemorate the day in an appropriate manner that contributes to raising public awareness.[1]The preamble of the resolution affirmed that:“ while democracies share common features, there is no single model of democracy and that democracy does not belong to any country or region…democracy is a universal value based on the freely-expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems, and their full participation in all aspects of life.
In 2007 the United Nations General Assembly decided to observe September 15th as the International Day of Democracy and invited all member states and organizations to commemorate the day in an appropriate manner that contributes to raising public awareness.
The preamble of the resolution affirmed that:
while democracies share common features, there is no single model of democracy and that democracy does not belong to any country or region…
democracy is a universal value based on the freely-expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems, and their full participation in all aspects of life.