<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quality Participation Doesn&#8217;t Waste Participants&#8217; Time!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/06/02/quality-participation-doesnt-waste-participants-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/06/02/quality-participation-doesnt-waste-participants-time/</link>
	<description>The Participation Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:45:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Create Policy on a Wiki</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/06/02/quality-participation-doesnt-waste-participants-time/comment-page-1/#comment-18647</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Create Policy on a Wiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=303#comment-18647</guid>
		<description>[...] And as I&#8217;ve argued before, quality participation doesn&#8217;t waste participants&#8217; time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And as I&#8217;ve argued before, quality participation doesn&#8217;t waste participants&#8217; time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenGov Open Feedback Firehose &#171; Intellitics, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/06/02/quality-participation-doesnt-waste-participants-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2115</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenGov Open Feedback Firehose &#171; Intellitics, Inc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=303#comment-2115</guid>
		<description>[...] As was expected, most of these sites are using IdeaScale for input gathering and discussion. Some of you may remember this tool from phase 1 of the Open Government Dialogue (see here, here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As was expected, most of these sites are using IdeaScale for input gathering and discussion. Some of you may remember this tool from phase 1 of the Open Government Dialogue (see here, here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

