<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 25 Types of Participant Input on Change.gov</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/02/15/25-types-of-participant-input-on-changegov/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/02/15/25-types-of-participant-input-on-changegov/</link>
	<description>The Participation Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:45:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NCDD Resource Center &#187; Tools for Online Idea Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/02/15/25-types-of-participant-input-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-21091</link>
		<dc:creator>NCDD Resource Center &#187; Tools for Online Idea Generation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 18:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=92#comment-21091</guid>
		<description>[...] at all, by the way), not unique and tend to include a lot of other stuff (see this older post about different types of participant input). Accordingly, voting on these tools tends to happens [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at all, by the way), not unique and tend to include a lot of other stuff (see this older post about different types of participant input). Accordingly, voting on these tools tends to happens [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Guide from NAPA: Tools for Online Idea Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/02/15/25-types-of-participant-input-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-20655</link>
		<dc:creator>New Guide from NAPA: Tools for Online Idea Generation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=92#comment-20655</guid>
		<description>[...] at all, by the way), not unique and tend to include a lot of other stuff (see this older post about different types of participant input). Accordingly, voting on these tools tends to happens [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at all, by the way), not unique and tend to include a lot of other stuff (see this older post about different types of participant input). Accordingly, voting on these tools tends to happens [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Full Circle Associates &#187; Social Media in Intl. Dev: Simone Staiger</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/02/15/25-types-of-participant-input-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>Full Circle Associates &#187; Social Media in Intl. Dev: Simone Staiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=92#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>[...] 25 Types of Participant Input on Change.gov [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 25 Types of Participant Input on Change.gov [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finding Appropriate Evaluation Criteria for Participant Input at Intellitics</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/02/15/25-types-of-participant-input-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Finding Appropriate Evaluation Criteria for Participant Input at Intellitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=92#comment-665</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s room for other, less commonly used criteria as well. If we assume for a second that all input types are not created equal, then surely there may be more appropriate evaluation criteria that can be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there&#8217;s room for other, less commonly used criteria as well. If we assume for a second that all input types are not created equal, then surely there may be more appropriate evaluation criteria that can be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-02-17 &#171; 6 to cut, 4 to sharpen</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/02/15/25-types-of-participant-input-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-02-17 &#171; 6 to cut, 4 to sharpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=92#comment-664</guid>
		<description>[...] 25 Types of Participant Input on Change.gov This is a great way to see how masses of people express thoughts online and how that can be organized. Fascinating breakdown of user input on the new change.gov site. He follows up by &quot;revisit[ing] two existing facilitation techniques that help guide participation by adding to the process the kind of structure that I believe could work very well for large-scale efforts.&quot; (tags: government democracy crowdsource obama) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 25 Types of Participant Input on Change.gov This is a great way to see how masses of people express thoughts online and how that can be organized. Fascinating breakdown of user input on the new change.gov site. He follows up by &quot;revisit[ing] two existing facilitation techniques that help guide participation by adding to the process the kind of structure that I believe could work very well for large-scale efforts.&quot; (tags: government democracy crowdsource obama) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Structuring Participant Input: Dynamic Facilitation, Brainstorming at Intellitics</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/02/15/25-types-of-participant-input-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Structuring Participant Input: Dynamic Facilitation, Brainstorming at Intellitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=92#comment-657</guid>
		<description>[...] Contact          &#171; 25 Types of Participant Input on Change.gov [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Contact          &laquo; 25 Types of Participant Input on Change.gov [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

