<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-participation efforts on Change.gov</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/01/17/e-participation-efforts-on-changegov/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/01/17/e-participation-efforts-on-changegov/</link>
	<description>The Participation Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:45:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Guide from NAPA: Tools for Online Idea Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/01/17/e-participation-efforts-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-24012</link>
		<dc:creator>New Guide from NAPA: Tools for Online Idea Generation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 19:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=72#comment-24012</guid>
		<description>[...] Another common feature in this tool category is that they expose the leader board (those ideas which have received the most votes). This, of course, tends to significantly distort the results as the top ideas receive the bulk of participants&#8217; attention (see this post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another common feature in this tool category is that they expose the leader board (those ideas which have received the most votes). This, of course, tends to significantly distort the results as the top ideas receive the bulk of participants&#8217; attention (see this post). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainstorming Policy Ideas Online: We&#8217;re Not There Yet!</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/01/17/e-participation-efforts-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-4313</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainstorming Policy Ideas Online: We&#8217;re Not There Yet!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=72#comment-4313</guid>
		<description>[...] what I wrote back in January 2009: Having looked at a number of large-scale online input gathering efforts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what I wrote back in January 2009: Having looked at a number of large-scale online input gathering efforts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama &#8211; Making sense of the world? &#171; blogs.independent.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/01/17/e-participation-efforts-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-3458</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama &#8211; Making sense of the world? &#171; blogs.independent.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 19:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=72#comment-3458</guid>
		<description>[...] signs are that Obama, and the team around him, are mindful of this. As&#160;others have&#160;noted already, one of the most&#160;encouraging aspect&#160;of the Change.gov experiment was the speed at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] signs are that Obama, and the team around him, are mindful of this. As&nbsp;others have&nbsp;noted already, one of the most&nbsp;encouraging aspect&nbsp;of the Change.gov experiment was the speed at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama: Making Sense of the World? &#124; Debategraph</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/01/17/e-participation-efforts-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-3184</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama: Making Sense of the World? &#124; Debategraph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 12:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=72#comment-3184</guid>
		<description>[...] signs are that Obama, and the team around him, are mindful of this. As&#160;others have&#160;noted already, one of the most&#160;encouraging aspect&#160;of the Change.gov experiment was the speed at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] signs are that Obama, and the team around him, are mindful of this. As&nbsp;others have&nbsp;noted already, one of the most&nbsp;encouraging aspect&nbsp;of the Change.gov experiment was the speed at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 14 Ways to Make Online Citizen Participation Work: “Keep folks in the loop!” &#171; Intellitics</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/01/17/e-participation-efforts-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>14 Ways to Make Online Citizen Participation Work: “Keep folks in the loop!” &#171; Intellitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=72#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the challenges we&#8217;ve seen with many of the recent e-participation initiatives at the national level is the fact that they tend to produce more raw content in a short period of time than any single participant would ever be able to digest. From what we&#8217;ve observed, this problem starts to occur at fairly small group sizes of several hundred participants and up, and the sheer volume of the participants&#8217; collective input can quickly become overwhelming (for details, see here, here and here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the challenges we&#8217;ve seen with many of the recent e-participation initiatives at the national level is the fact that they tend to produce more raw content in a short period of time than any single participant would ever be able to digest. From what we&#8217;ve observed, this problem starts to occur at fairly small group sizes of several hundred participants and up, and the sheer volume of the participants&#8217; collective input can quickly become overwhelming (for details, see here, here and here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama: Making Sense of the World? : Open to persuasion&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/01/17/e-participation-efforts-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama: Making Sense of the World? : Open to persuasion&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=72#comment-637</guid>
		<description>[...] signs are that Obama, and the team around him, are mindful of this. As&#160;others have&#160;noted already, one of the most&#160;encouraging aspect&#160;of the Change.gov experiment was the speed at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] signs are that Obama, and the team around him, are mindful of this. As&nbsp;others have&nbsp;noted already, one of the most&nbsp;encouraging aspect&nbsp;of the Change.gov experiment was the speed at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2009/01/17/e-participation-efforts-on-changegov/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellitics.com/blog/?p=72#comment-636</guid>
		<description>PEP-NET has a comprehensive review up:

&quot;Change.gov – citizen engagement during Barack Obama’s transition&quot;
http://pep-net.eu/wordpress/?p=300

As they correctly point out, &quot;Join the Discussion&quot; had two additional installments that I had almost overlooked:

Join the Discussion: Economy (approx. December 3-10) 
http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_economy/

Join the Discussion: Service (approx. December 12-18)
http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_service/

I&#039;ve updated the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PEP-NET has a comprehensive review up:</p>
<p>&#8220;Change.gov – citizen engagement during Barack Obama’s transition&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://pep-net.eu/wordpress/?p=300" rel="nofollow">http://pep-net.eu/wordpress/?p=300</a></p>
<p>As they correctly point out, &#8220;Join the Discussion&#8221; had two additional installments that I had almost overlooked:</p>
<p>Join the Discussion: Economy (approx. December 3-10)<br />
<a href="http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_economy/" rel="nofollow">http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_economy/</a></p>
<p>Join the Discussion: Service (approx. December 12-18)<br />
<a href="http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_service/" rel="nofollow">http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_service/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve updated the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

